Trade-Monkey |
|
. : About me : .
. : Recent Posts : .
The Avuncular State . : Archives : .
February 2006 . : Tools : .
|
Syndicate:
. : Fin/Econ Links : .
. : Misc Links : . Atlas Shrugs Belmont Club Cato Institute Foreign Dispatches Instapundit Kim Du Toit MIT OpenCourseware Oxblog Protein Wisdom Samizdata Templates By Caz TCS Daily Truth on the Market Volokh Conspiracy **View my Wish List** . : Credits : .
Template By Caz |
|
Thursday, April 20, 2006Foreign Stocks Are In, and So Is IndexingForeign stocks are soaring and Americans are pouring money into them. But although overseas equities have captured investors' fancy before, there's a twist this time: More investors are embracing passive, index-style investing, ignoring the long-held belief that active managers can beat indexers by uncovering bargains in inefficient foreign markets. More from Wharton: "In February...investors poured nearly $19 billion into foreign-stock mutual funds, compared to $8.4 billion for U.S. stock funds.... ...American investors have also grown enamored of indexers, which now hold about 15% of assets invested in foreign-stock funds, up from about 5% in 2001, according to AMG Data Services. 'People want diversification at the cheapest cost,' notes Wharton finance professor Jeremy Siegel, who talks about the latest economic developments in a podcast included in this issue......It probably will continue. 'Siegel says the typical American investor should have 40% of his or her equity portfolio in foreign stocks....you don't want to confine yourself to one country....I really advise broad diversification.' 40% seems a bit high, especially in today's foreign equity markets, but the point is valid non-the-less.
|